Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 906 F.2d 1185 - Bank of Waunakee v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc.

Bank of Waunakee v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

906 F.2d 1185 · 1990

Citation profile

186
cited by 186 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 22 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 186 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Ruiz Rivera v. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, LLC (2008), DeBruyne v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (1990)

22 federal appellate · 22 district · 1 state decisions

7501990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Twohy v. First National Bank · Above Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc. · Herman v. City of Chicago · McMillian v. Svetanoff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 186 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Court has patently misunderstood a party, or has made a decision outside the adversarial issues presented to the Court by the parties, or has made an error not of reasoning but of apprehension. A further basis for a motion for reconsideration would be a controlling or significant change in the law or facts since the submission of the issue to the Court. Such problems rarely arise and the motion to reconsider should be equally rare.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) Unless an account debtor has made an enforceable agreement not to assert defenses or claims arising out of a sale as provided in Section 9-206 the rights of an assignee are subject to (a) all the terms of the contract between the account debtor and assignor and any defense or claim arising therefrom; and (b) any other defense or claim of the account debtor against the assignor which accrues before the account debtor receives notification of the assignment.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if ... there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.