Fox v. Dannenberg’s Empirical Analysis
906 F.2d 1253 · 1990
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Waldorf v. Shuta (1998), Arcoren v. United States (1991)
36 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brody v. Guercio · Ohse v. Hughes · Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-Appellees · Mannino v. International Manufacturing Co. · Grogan v. Garner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Rule 702 reflects an attempt to liberalize the rules governing the admission of expert testimony.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Marnette v. Morgan · Dean v. State“Once the trial court has determined that a witness is competent to testify as an expert, challenges to the expert's skill or knowledge go to the weight to be accorded the expert testimony rather than to its admissibility.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.