Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 906 F.2d 1319 - Pottgieser ex rel. Estate of Pottgieser v. Kizer

Pottgieser ex rel. Estate of Pottgieser v. Kizer’s Empirical Analysis

906 F.2d 1319 · 1990

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2016

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

100199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395C (§ 1811 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395J (§ 1831 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395V (§ 1843 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395X (§ 1861 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Pierce v. Underwood · Harris v. McRae · Heckler v. Ringer · Colautti v. Franklin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “under the plain language of the statute, costs of service are different than premiums, and premiums are not included in the definition of 'medical assistance'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e do not find the statute ambiguous or Congressional intent unclear, but we nevertheless reject the Secretary's argument”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Failure to prevail does not raise a presumption that the government's position was unreasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.