Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 906 F.2d 1579 - Teledyne Continental Motors v. United States

Teledyne Continental Motors v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

906 F.2d 1579 · 1990

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Seidman 92-3722 92-3729 Seidman v. Office of Thrift Supervision Department of Treasury United States (1994), Garrett III v. General Electric Company (1993)

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

170199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 41 U.S.C. § 605

Relies on Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Catlin v. United States · Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord · Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Wetzel · Flanagan v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “final judgment rule requires that a party must ordinarily raise all claims of error in a single appeal following final judgment on the merits.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)); Teledyne Cont’l Motors v. United States, 906 F.2d 1579 , 1582 (Fed.Cir.1990) (emphasizing that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute judgment.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “) appeals the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.