Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 906 F.2d 506 - Shafer v. Stratton

Shafer v. Stratton’s Empirical Analysis

906 F.2d 506 · 1990

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
November 2016
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Steele v. Young (1993), Andrews v. Deland (1991)

26 federal appellate · 1 district ·

280199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Murray v. Carrier · Michigan v. Long · Engle v. Isaac · Caldwell v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Habeas proceedings may not be used to set aside a state conviction on the basis of erroneous jury instructions unless the errors had the effect of rendering the trial so fundamentally unfair as to cause a denial of a fair trial in the constitutional sense.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a procedural default does not bar consideration of a federal claim on either direct or habeas review unless the last state court rendering a judgment in the case 'clearly and expressly' states that its judgment rests on a state procedural bar.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “or that the failure to consider the federal claim will result in a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.