Parkes v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
906 F.2d 658 · 1990
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2017
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1821 · 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Crawford Fitting Company v. Jt Gibbons Inc Champion International Corporation · Marek v. Chesny · Glenn v. General Motors Corp. · Leroy v. City of Houston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, 'the costs which are subject to the cost-shifting provisions of Rule 68 are those enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 1920 , unless the substantive law applicable to the particular cause of action expands the general § 1920 definition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] party defending against a claim may serve upon the adverse party an offer to allow judgment to be taken against the defending party for the money or property or to the effect specified in the offer, with costs then accrued.... An offer not accepted shall be deemed withdrawn and evidence thereof is not admissible except in a proceeding to determine costs. If the judgment finally obtained by the offeree is not more favorable than the offer, the of-feree must pay the costs incurred after the making of the offer.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Phillips v. Bartoo“[e]xcept when express provision therefor is made in a statute, costs shall be allowed as of course to the prevailing party unless the court otherwise directs, and this provision is applicable in all cases in which the state is a party plaintiff in civil actions as in cases of individual suitors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.