Barbera v. Pearson Educ., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
906 F.3d 621 · 2018
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Coleman v. Donahoe · Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. · O'Leary v. Accretive Health, Inc. · Darst ex rel. Bankruptcy Estate of Chalimoniuk v. Interstate Brands Corp. · Hanners v. Trent
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“show pretext, or at least to produce evidence establishing a genuine factual dispute about pretext to defeat summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“present a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the challenged employment action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.