United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
906 F.3d 645 · 2018
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Relies on United States v. Olano · Johnson v. Zerbst · United States v. Kappes · United States v. Thompson · United States v. Siegel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“district court expressly invited objections to the proposed visitation condition, and Smith's attorney, with the benefit of having seen the condition in advance, responded that the condition was 'reasonable.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“? (7) you shall refrain from ? any or ? excessive use of alcohol (defined as having a blood alcohol concentration greater than 0.08%; or ? ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Smith has not argued that either he or his attorney was confused or that the response did not indicate approval.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.