Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

906 So. 2d 1193

Docket No. 4D04-2126.

Roberts v. Roberts

Sandra S. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. Mark Elliot ROBERTS, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-07-20

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 2013

2 state decisions

Relies on 851 So. 2d 819 - Dent v. Dent · Flores v. Flores

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-07-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Eddie Stephen of the Law Offices of Eddie Stephens, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Robert M.W. Shalhoub of the Law Offices of Robert M.W. Shalhoub, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The former wife appeals the trial court's findings that temporary alimony and child support were excessive and its award of a credit for the overpayment. In approving this overpayment credit, we follow our decision on this same issue in Flores v. Flores,874 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 4th DCA), review granted, (June 29, 2004). See also Dent v. Dent,851 So.2d 819 (Fla. 2d DCA *1194 2003) (Stringer, J., concurring specially). We find the former wife's other arguments to be without merit.

¶5Affirmed.

¶6STEVENSON, C.J., TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

/906/so2d/1193 · .json · Public domain