Havens v. Chambliss’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 368 So. 2d 1307 - FMC Corp. v. Chatman · 714 So. 2d 1098 - Modellista De Europa v. REDPATH INVESTMENT · 870 So. 2d 89 - CPI Mfg. Co. v. Industrias St. Jack's, SA · 472 So. 2d 768 - Paedae v. Voltaggio · Blythe v. James Lock & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rule is mandatory; `[u]nless a party can satisfy the exceptions provided for in the rule, it specifically states `shall dismiss,' and there is no discretion on the trial court's part if it is demonstrated to the trial court that no action toward prosecution has been taken within a year.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.