Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 906 SO2D 34 - Hall v. State

Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McFee v. State · 577 So. 2d 394 - Wilson v. State · 878 So. 2d 933 - Scott v. State · 635 So. 2d 851 - Banana v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for the counsel's unprofessional errors, the result would have been different.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We will not find ineffective assistance where a defendant's underlying claim is without merit. Similarly, multiple defaults that do not independently constitute error will not be aggregated to find reversible error. Our review is highly deferential to the attorney, with a strong presumption that the attorney's conduct fell within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance. However, an attorney's lapse must be viewed in light of the nature and seriousness of the charges and the potential penalty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.