Peters v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 563 So. 2d 594 - Bell v. Parker · 637 So. 2d 850 - Chamblee v. Chamblee · 732 So. 2d 876 - Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick · 626 So. 2d 140 - Daigle v. Daigle · 607 So. 2d 1204 - Faries v. Faries
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]onduct that either (1) endangers life, limb, or health, or creates a reasonable apprehension of such danger, rendering the relationship unsafe for the party-seeking relief, or (2) is so unnatural and infamous as to make the marriage revolting to the non-offending spouse and render it impossible for that spouse to discharge the duties of marriage, thus destroying the basis for its continuance.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Pace v. Pace · Price v. Price“The Court recognizes that the gross annual income stated herein exceeds the $50,000.00 recited by the statute. At this point in time, however, the Court sees no reason to deviate from the statutory child support guideline of twenty percent of the adjusted gross income.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The sufficiency of the evidence is determined by the chancellor, who sits as finder of fact and makes determinations as to the weight and credibility of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.