Brock v. Brock’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 639 So. 2d 921 - Ferguson v. Ferguson · 437 So. 2d 1003 - Albright v. Albright · 639 So. 2d 909 - Hemsley v. Hemsley · 650 So. 2d 1281 - Johnson v. Johnson · 784 So. 2d 943 - Hollon v. Hollon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When separate property and marital property are mixed to such a degree that the elements cannot be distinguished, i.e., that the separate element cannot be traced, then the entire property is considered marital property: the separate property has transmuted by commingling into marital property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Property obtained by inheritance or by gift is non-marital property and not subject to equitable distribution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.