Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 906 S.W.2d 608 - Drone v. State

Drone v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2019

24 state decisions

110199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 20th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Williamson v. United States · Geesa v. State · Harris v. State · Narvaiz v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(24) Statement Against Interest. A statement which was at the time of its making so far contrary to the declarant’s pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far tended to subject the declarant to civil or criminal liability, or to render invalid a claim by the declarant against another, or to make the declarant an object of hatred, ridicule, or disgrace, that a reasonable person in declarant’s position would not have made the statement unless believing it to be true. In criminal cases, a statement tending to expose the declarant to criminal liability is not admissible unless corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “heard about a complaint against [appellant] made by a—a woman here in Cameron for aggravated sexual assault.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “these specific instances of conduct unless the State can show that there's been some kind of conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.