Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

906 S.W.2d 869

Adams v. James

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1995

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1995-08-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1998

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-08-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellant, Craig S. Adams, appeals from the judgment in his court-tried defamation action against respondents Gary D. James, Connie Roberts, and James Van Amburg. We affirm.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by the evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/906/sw2d/869 · .json · Public domain