Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

907 A.2d 684

In re Brown

Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · decided 2006-07-14

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2017

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-07-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1CONCURRING STATEMENT OF

Judge LAMB.

¶2I concur in the Order of Sanction imposed in this case based on the following factors:

¶3a.the Respondent admitted his conduct as set out in the Findings of Fact in this Court’s Opinion of July 14, 2006, and that such conduct constitutes a violation of Rule 4(C) of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges;

¶4b. the Respondent was contrite;

¶5c. the Respondent apologized to those affected; and

¶6d. the Respondent represented to this Court that he would never again seek judicial office in this Commonwealth.

/907/a2d/684 · .json · Public domain