Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 F.2d 1041 - Farmer v. Higgins

Farmer v. Higgins’s Empirical Analysis

907 F.2d 1041 · 1990

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
January 2023
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5821 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 26 U.S.C. § 5822 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on United States v. Turkette · Gun South, Inc. v. Brady · Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. v. Sawhill · Veterans Administration Medical Center Tampa Florida v. Federal Labor Relations Authority · U.S. Army Engineer Center v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that Congress intended to change the law to prospectively preclude the private possession of machine guns, and (2) that Congress intended to limit lawful transfer and possession of machine guns to instances authorized by the government for the benefit of federal, state, or local governmental entities. Consequently, in light of the plain language of section 922(o), as well as its legislative history, we hold that section 922(o) prohibits the private possession of machine guns not lawfully possessed prior to May 19, 1986.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “I do not know why anyone would object to the banning of machineguns.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the plain language of section 922(o), as well as its legislative history ... prohibits the private possession of machine guns not lawfully possessed prior to May 19, 1986.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.