Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

907 F.2d 1138

Docket No. 89-7587.

Charles Thomas Locklear v. James E. Johnson William P. Rogers

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 30, 1989. Decided June 4, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-06-04

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re Aaron Holsey

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-06-04

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 88-60-L)

Charles Thomas Locklear, appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Charles Thomas Locklear appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Locklear v. Johnson, C/A No. 88-60-L (W.D.Va. Mar. 28, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/907/f2d/1138 · .json · Public domain