Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 F.2d 124 - Reynoldson v. Shillinger

Reynoldson v. Shillinger’s Empirical Analysis

907 F.2d 124 · 1990

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2023
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2023 · most notably Sandin v. Conner (1995), Hall v. Bellmon (1991)

26 federal appellate · 7 district ·

2701990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Haines v. Kerner · Neitzke v. Williams · Hewitt v. Helms · Hughes v. Rowe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]articularly when deficiencies in a complaint are attributable to oversights likely the result of an untutored pro se litigant's ignorance of special pleading requirements, dismissal of the complaint without prejudice is preferable.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]f it is at all possible that the party against whom the dismissal is directed can correct the defect in the pleading or state a claim for relief, the court should dismiss with leave to amend.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “only be dismissed for failure to state a claim if it appears 'beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.