Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 F.2d 1242 - Project Basic v. J O'Rourke Project Basic

Project Basic v. J O'Rourke Project Basic’s Empirical Analysis

907 F.2d 1242 · 1990

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
March 1992
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1437A · 42 U.S.C. § 1437P · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D · 42 U.S.C. § 3601 (§ 801 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · Udall v. Tallman · Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “BASIC says that HUD lacks standing to appeal the [1989 Order], for the order tells PHA, not HUD, what to do.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reconsider the legal basis for its order if [the parties] request it to do so.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the parties may ... no longer disagree about the order,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.