Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 F.2d 1274 - E.H. Ashley & Co. v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services

E.H. Ashley & Co. v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services’s Empirical Analysis

907 F.2d 1274 · 1990

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
7
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 10 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Dubois v. United States Department of Agriculture (1996), Sarit v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (1993)

41 federal appellate · 10 district · 8 state decisions

4901990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc. · Mack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. · Schapansky v. Department of Transportation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is enough that the appellants and their attorney should have been aware that the appeal had no chance of success.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “prove that (1) there is an absence of meaningful choice on the part of one of the parties; and (2) the challenged contract terms are unreasonably favorable to the other party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “counsel[ed] against saying that Efron 'had no legitimate ground for pursuing this appeal.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.