Jackson v. Thornburgh’s Empirical Analysis
907 F.2d 194 · 1990
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 18 U.S.C. § 4161
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Singleton v. Wulff · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Bolling v. Sharpe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“federal authorities will accept a District prisoner only to avert District violation of its caps.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fields v. Keohane
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.