United States v. Studley’s Empirical Analysis
907 F.2d 254 · 1990
Citation profile
53 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on Nicholas v. United States · United States v. Diaz-Villafane · United States v. Aguilar-Pena · United States v. Williams · United States of America v. Anthony Decologero.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[a] court should not mold typical criminal conduct or defendant characteristics into atypicality merely to achieve a departure from the guidelines,'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“so extraordinary as to suggest its presence to a degree not adequately taken into consideration by the acceptance of responsibility reduction. ”)(citing United States v. Studley, 907 F.2d 254, 259 (1st Cir.1990). 16 . See n. 2, supra. 17 . This is not to suggest that being”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission in formulating the guidelines.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.