Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 F.2d 367 - Wells v. Sullivan

Wells v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

907 F.2d 367 · 1990

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
February 2023
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2023 · most notably Gisbrecht v. Barnhart (2002), Alderman v. Pan Am World Airways (1999)

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1901990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Blum v. Stenson · Venegas v. Mitchell · Mckittrick v. Gardner · Wells v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the anomalous role of the Social Security Administration in first denying benefits to a claimant, and then after losing the case, posing as a protector of the plaintiff, but spending more time and money in order to reduce the fees to be paid to the claimant's attorney.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment, and the Commissioner of Social Security may, notwithstanding the provisions of section 405(i) of this title, but subject to subsection (d) of this section, certify the amount of such fee for payment to such attorney out of, and not in addition to, the amount of such past-due benefits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[ Section] 406(b) requires the district court to review the reasonableness of any requested fee....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.