Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation Mdl Docket No Meat Price Investigators Association v. Iowa Beef Processors Inc’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2013
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Monsanto Company v. Spray-Rite Service Corporation · Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an antitrust plaintiff relies on circumstantial evidence of conscious parallelism to prove a § 1 claim, he must first demonstrate that the defendant's actions were parallel”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.