Wider v. Wootton’s Empirical Analysis
907 F.2d 570 · 1990
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably WesBanco Bank Barnesville v. Rafoth (1997), Sender v. Nancy Elizabeth R. Heggland Family Trust (1995)
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 546 · 11 U.S.C. § 547 · 11 U.S.C. § 741
Relies on Tompkins v. Texas · In Re Bullion Reserve of North America, a California Corporation, Curtis B. Danning, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Theodore P. Bozek · Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.) · Bozek v. Danning · Henderson v. Allred (In Re Western World Funding, Inc.)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(53A) The term “stockbroker” means person— (A) with respect to which there is a customer, as defined in section 741 of this title; and (B) That is engaged in the business of effecting transactions in securities' — • (i) for the account of others; or (ii) with members of the general public, from or for such person’s own account.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]his Court fails to see how a Ponzi scheme could be in the ordinary course of business for purposes of the stockholder defense, but not in the ordinary course of business for purposes of the preference provisions.”). 27 . We note that the Trustee’s focus on Templeton’s belief at the time of the investments appears misplaced. Rather,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“entity that has a claim against a person arising out of— (i) a sale or conversion of a security received, acquired, or held as specified in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph; or (ii) a deposit of cash, a security, or other property with such person for the purpose of purchasing or selling a security.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Slatkin v. Neilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.