Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 F.2d 693 - United States v. Barnes

United States v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis

907 F.2d 693 · 1990

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably United States v. Jewel (1991), United States v. Barnes (1991)

24 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2501990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Tucker · Townsend v. Burke · Williams v. State of Oklahoma · United States v. Harris · United States v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he district court’s comments at sentencing raise sufficient doubts in our mind whether it imposed its sentence wholly unthout regard to the hearsay statements of the confidential informant. Granted, we cannot be sure that these statements influenced Judge Duffs sentencing determinations, but given the closeness of this question—and the relatively low standard, under the law of this circuit, by which Barnes must prove his case—we vacate and remand so that Barnes may have an opportunity to challenge these statements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'before making [a sentencing] *309 determination, a judge may appropriately conduct an inquiry broad in scope, largely unlimited either as to the kind of information he may consider, or the source from which it may come.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The standard for determining whether the district court relied on improper information is a low one,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.