Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 F.2d 896 - United States v. Behnezhad

United States v. Behnezhad’s Empirical Analysis

907 F.2d 896 · 1990

Citation profile

122
cited by 122 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
September 2015
most recently cited

82 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 122 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2015 · most notably Johnson v. United States (2000), Johnson v. United States (2000)

82 federal appellate · 5 district ·

1000199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3556 · 18 U.S.C. § 3565 · 18 U.S.C. § 3572 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · United States v. McConney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 122 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we generally construe a statute written in the disjunctive as setting out separate and distinct alternatives.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]f a district court finds that a person has violated a condition of supervised release, then the court may either revoke the term of supervised release and incarcerate the person, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583 (e)(3), or the court may take the actions specified in section 3583(e)(2).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if there is sufficient evidence to support the court's decision and the defendant did not object to that evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.