Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
907 F.2d 911 · 1990
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 31 district · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 127 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Watkins (1993), Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd. (1994)
29 federal appellate · 31 district · 25 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty. · Robnett v. United States · International Oilfield Divers, Inc. v. Pickle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“--the indemnification and defense of claims--will travel. 19 Id. (footnote and citation omitted) (emphasis added). 20 This reasoning is equally apt in the case presented here. Motorists' purposefully availed itself of the Tennessee forum by contractually providing explicit insurance coverage for any accidents in Tennessee. 2 The fact that Motorists' chose to provide coverage for all fifty states--indeed, such coverage is almost certainly the only kind of marketable auto insurance--constitutes purposeful availment of any individual state's forum. 21 The Farmers court found that the second,”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`[o]nly contacts occurring prior to the event causing the litigation may be considered'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) The nonresident defendant must do some act or consummate some transaction with the forum or perform some act by which [it] purposefully avails [it]self of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum, thereby invoking the benefits and protections of its laws. (2) the claim must be one which arises out of or results from the defendant’s forum-related activities. (3) exercise of jurisdiction must be reasonable.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.