In re Murphy-Brown, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
907 F.3d 788 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on Elrod v. Burns · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Branzburg v. Hayes · Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]rits of mandamus function differently from ordinary appeals. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.