Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 F.3d 956 - Zander v. Orlich

Zander v. Orlich’s Empirical Analysis

907 F.3d 956 · 2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
August 2022
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · West Norris v. Waymire · Stropes Ex Rel. Taylor v. Heritage House Childrens Center of Shelbyville, Inc. · Home Valu, Inc. v. Pep Boys · Simmons v. Chicago Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 56 'mandates the entry of summary judgment, after adequate time for discovery and upon motion, against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.