907 F. Supp. 658 - Arce v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2016
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Wolff v. McDonnell · Sandin v. Conner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“combined effects of [the plaintiff's 18] day segregation plus exercise deprivation and verbal harassment”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arce v. Walker · Hynes v. Squillace“Arce does not assert that the liberty interest arose as the result of a state law or regulation prohibiting extended confinement without a hearing, but rather was implicated by the Due Process [C]lause alone.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arce v. Walker“[e]xercise deprivation for several days is surely not of such moment as to constitute a Due Process deprivation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arce v. Walker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.