907 N.E.2d 973
Decided June 16, 2009
Indiana Supreme Court · decided 2009-06-16
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2015
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relies on Pruitt v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2009-06-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1dissenting.
¶2For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Pruitt v. State, 903 N.E.2d 899, 940 (Ind.2009), I would grant rehearing, vacate the judgment of the post-conviction court, and remand this cause with instructions to impose a term of years.