McMillian v. Holcomb’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2025
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Hinshaw v. State · Chamberlin v. Chamberlin · Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co. · Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A 'motion to reconsider' does not exist in the nomenclature of Oklahoma's statutory pleading scheme,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“'the sufficiency or insufficiency of the compensation”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The following shall not constitute a judgment, decree, or appealable order: .... informal statement of the proceedings and relief awarded, including, but not limited to ... instructions for preparing the judgment, decree, or appealable order””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.