Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 P2D 319 - State v. Kealey

State v. Kealey’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
5
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2023

19 state decisions

901996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Chadwick · Rawlings v. Kentucky · Smith v. Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]urses, briefcases, and luggage constitute traditional repositories of personal belongings protected under the Fourth Amendment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he owner of lost or mislaid property, who is in the eyes of the common law an inadvertent bailor, retains a reasonable expectation of privacy in the property ... This expectation of privacy is diminished, however, by the fact that the finder/bailee has an obligation to seek out the owner of the goods and try to return them. In other words, the owner's expectation of privacy is diminished to the extent that the finder may examine and search the lost property to determine its owner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`What a person knowingly exposes to the public is not protected ...' `the reasonableness of [the defendant's] expectation of privacy turned on the defendant's right to exclude others from the premises.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.