Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 P.2d 690 - People v. Monroe

People v. Monroe’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Baker v. United States · Rodriguez v. District Court for the City & County of Denver · People v. Aalbu · People v. Schultheis · People v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Contrary to the People’s suggestion, Colorado law recognizes that in-court identifications may be per se impermissibly suggestive because the physical arrangement of the courtroom demonstrates to the witness that it is the defendant who is charged. Thus, even though a witness has not participated in any pre-trial identification procedure, the People are nonetheless required to make the same showing on such testimony as would he necessary had the mtness been subjected to an impermis-sibly suggestive pre-trial procedure. People v. Walker, 666 P.2d 113 (Colo.1983). The People have the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that the in-eourt identification is based upon the witness’ prior independent observations of the defendant. In determining whether the witness possesses such an independent basis, the court considers five factors: (1) the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time in question; (2) the witness’ degree of attention; (3) the accuracy of any prior description of the criminal by the witness; (4) the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the later confrontation; and (5) the time which has elapsed between the crime and the confrontation. People v. Walker, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “may not have been such as to require the court to authorize [counsel's] withdrawal,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “proper basis upon which the court [could] authorize such withdrawal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.