Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

907 So. 2d 1267

Docket No. 3D05-1635.

Loguercio v. State

Luis LOGUERCIO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-08-03

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2009

2 state decisions

Relies on 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · 843 So. 2d 885 - Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-08-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Hersch & Talisman and Richard Hersch, Miami, for petitioner.

¶2Enoch J. Whitney, General Counsel and Jason Helfant, Assistant General Counsel, for respondent.

¶3Before RAMIREZ, SUAREZ, and CORTIÑAS, JJ.

¶4SUAREZ, Judge.

¶5Petitioner, Luis Loguercio, seeks certiorari review of the Circuit Court, Appellate Division, per curiam affirmance of a Final Order of License Suspension issued after a hearing by the Bureau of Administrative Reviews of the State of Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles Division of Driver Licenses. The standard that applies for review by the appellate court of a decision rendered by the Circuit Court in its appellate capacity is whether the Circuit Court's opinion is either a departure from the essential requirements of law or did not afford procedural due process. Combs v. State,436 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1983); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos,843 So.2d 885 (Fla.2003). Petitioner has not met that standard of review.

¶6Petition for Certiorari is dismissed.

/907/so2d/1267 · .json · Public domain