907 So. 2d 389 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · Rhode Island v. Innis · Harrison v. United States · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The decision [of whether the error of admitting a confession was harmless] requires an examination of the facts, the trial context of the error, and the prejudice created thereby as juxtaposed against the strength of the evidence of defendant's guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if the whole record demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that it was without any substantial prejudicial effect under all of the facts and circumstances of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“resulted in a manifest miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Starr v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.