Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 SO2D 470 - Knight v. State

Knight v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 17

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Ring v. Arizona · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen · Wayte v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' Ponder v. State, 688 So.2d 280, 285 (Ala.Crim.App.1996) (quoting Bush v. State, 695 So.2d 70, 92 (Ala.Crim.App. 1995)). Accordingly, this aggravating circumstance was erroneously applied in this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 937 So. 2d 1065 - Scott v. State
  2. “on him. Wayte v. United States, 470 U.S. 598 (1985).'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 937 So. 2d 1065 - Scott v. State
  3. “the existence of purposeful discrimination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 937 So. 2d 1065 - Scott v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.