State v. Rodriguez’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · 445 So. 2d 605 - State v. Del Gaudio · Miller v. State · Manuel v. State · 641 So. 2d 490 - Quarrells v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is manifest that whatever prejudice to a defendant’s ability to defend against the charges may be said to arise from a delay in providing him with discovery is cured when he is provided with such discovery, and there is no other impediment to his utilizing it in the preparation of his defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guillen v. State“the reasons for the delay in furnishing discovery, that is, was the State's violation inadvertent or willful, are relevant only for the purpose of subjecting counsel for the State to an appropriate sanction pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(j)(2) (now 3.220(n)(2)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.