Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 So. 2d 582 - Smith v. State

907 So. 2d 582 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 446 So. 2d 1038 - Lusk v. State · Trotter v. State · 477 So. 2d 553 - Hill v. State · 860 So. 2d 930 - Conde v. State · 699 So. 2d 629 - Dobson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “detaining the defendant constitutes lawful execution of a legal duty”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This court has held that it is error not to grant a challenge for cause when there is a basis for any reasonable doubt as to the juror's ability to render an impartial verdict, and that close cases should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The test for determining juror competency is whether the juror can lay aside any bias or prejudice and render a verdict solely on the evidence presented and the instructions on the law given by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.