Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 SO2D 699 - McKnight v. Evancheck

McKnight v. Evancheck’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp. · 706 So. 2d 43 - Cox v. Burke · 816 So. 2d 251 - Morgan v. Campbell · Williams v. State · 843 So. 2d 950 - Arzuman v. Saud

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A “fraud on the court” occurs where it can be. demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “found that [the plaintiff] lied about his extensive medical history, which had a direct bearing on his claim for damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “misrepresentations, if they had been successful, would have interfered with the jury's ability to adjudicate the issues.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.