Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 907 So. 2d 739 - State v. Leger

907 So. 2d 739 - State v. Leger’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · California v. Green · Tibbs v. Florida · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a witness is impeached, this simply means the jury, as the trier of fact, was presented with evidence which it could consider and weigh in determining the credibility, or believability, of a witness. Simply because the witness may have been impeached by prior inconsistent statements does not mean that the jury was prohibited from believing anything said by the witness. The inconsistencies in the witness's statements are one of any number of factors the jury weighs in determining whether or not to believe a witness's trial testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit any crime shall be fined or imprisoned, or both, in the same manner as for the offense contemplated by the conspirators; provided, however, whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit a crime punishable by death or life imprisonment shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not more than thirty years.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “accept or reject, in whole or in part, the testimony of any witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.