907 So. 2d 985 - Frazier v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
36
cited by 36 later decisions
3
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
36 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Smith v. State · 542 So. 2d 914 - Hentz v. State · 793 So. 2d 591 - Cox v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Confrontation Clause of the Federal Constitution's Sixth Amendment bars the admissibility of out-of-court testimonial statements by an unavailable witness offered in a criminal trial to prove the truth of a matter asserted (also known as hearsay) unless the defendant has had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness about the statement.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State · Bell v. State“testimonial hearsay must be exposed to confrontation by way of cross-examination prior to reaching admissible status, while non-testimonial hearsay does not trigger the need for confrontation to be admissible.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State · Bell v. State“evidence. Id. According to Crawford , prior testimony at a preliminary hearing, before a grand jury, or at a former trial and prior testimony during police interrogations, are all examples of”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State · Bell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.