Pratt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cain v. Bain · Pool v. Ford Motor Co. · McGalliard v. Kuhlmann · Leyva v. Pacheco · Burnett v. Motyka
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the proposed resident is a person with mental retardation; (2) evidence is presented showing that because of retardation, the proposed resident: (A) represents a substantial risk of physical impairment or injury to himself or others; or (B) is unable to provide for and is not providing for the proposed resident’s most basic personal physical needs; (3) the proposed resident cannot be adequately and appropriately habilitated in an available, less restrictive setting; and (4) the residential care facility provides habilitative services, care, training, and treatment appropriate to the proposed resident’s needs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.