Wall v. Wall’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited
1 district · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Massengill v. Scott · Stacks v. Saunders · Riddick v. Riddick · Dantzler v. Dantzler · Musselman v. Acuff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When two people join in conceiving a child, they select that child’s natural parents. When they decide to separate and divorce, they give up the privilege of jointly rearing the child, and the divorce court must decide which parent will have primary responsibility for rearing the child. This decision of the Court is not changeable except for “change of circumstances” which is defined as that which requires a change to prevent substantial harm to the child. Custody is not changed for the welfare or pleasure of either parent or to punish either parent, but to preserve the welfare of the child. Custody is not changed because one parent is able to furnish a more commodious or pleasant environment than the other, but where continua- Lion of the adjudicated custody will substantially harm the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bridges v. King
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.