Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 908 A2D 1182 - Mayers v. Mayers

Mayers v. Mayers’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

1 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Liteky et al United States · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · Kontrick v. Ryan · Johnson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In place of the record on appeal as defined in Rule 10(a), the parties may prepare, sign, and submit to the trial judge a statement of the case showing how the issues presented by the appeal arose and were decided in the Superior Court. The statement must set forth only those facts averred and proved or sought to be proved that are essential to the court’s resolution of the issues. If the statement is accurate, it— together with any additions that the trial judge may consider necessary to a full presentation of the issues on appeal — must be approved by the trial judge and must then be certified to this court as the record on appeal. A copy of the agreed statement may be filed in place of the appendix required by Rule 30.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Matters of discretion are reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”). Reese alleges that.it was error for the court to deny her motion, to enjoin Bank of America from freezing the LLC's funds, and to deny her motion for recusal. She also alleges that it was error to exclude certain testimony regarding her husband Kevin Reese, and to refuse a certain jury instruction regarding notice under the dissociation statute. We discern no abuse of discretion. 7 . In fact, § 29-807.01(b) allows the trial judge to choose between dissolution and some other”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “judge may have personal experience with particular parties who have appeared before [her] in previous cases, ... such prior knowledge does not, by itself, generally raise questions about the fairness of a judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.