Boyd v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
February 2017
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Bruton v. United States · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] prosecutor's timely disclosure obligation with respect to Brady material can never be overemphasized, and the practice of delayed production must be disapproved and discouraged.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he presence of a factual inconsistency, "without more, will not give rise to a due-process violation. Rather, at a minimum, “[t]o violate due process, an inconsistency must exist at the core of the prosecutor’s cases against the two defendants for the same crime,” and the inconsistency “must have rendered unreliable” the resulting conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In arguable cases, the prosecutor should provide the potentially exculpatory information to the defense or, at the very least, make it available to the trial court for in camera inspection.”). 14 . The prosecutor stated that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.