Ford v. ChartOne, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 12 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Shaw v. Marriott International, Inc. (2010), 643 F. Supp. 2d 1133 - In Re Flash Memory Antitrust Litigation (2009)
2 federal appellate · 12 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Koon v. United States · Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp. · Johnson v. United States · Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the CPPA does not protect merchants in their commercial dealings with suppliers or other merchants.... The term “merchant means a person who does or would sell, lease (to), or transfer, either directly or indirectly, consumer goods or services, or a person who does or would supply the goods or services which are or would be the subject matter of a trade practice.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“A person, whether acting for the interests of itself, its members, or the general public, may bring an action under this chapter in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia seeking relief from the use by any person of a trade practice in violation of a law of the District of Columbia and may recover or obtain the following remedies....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[cjlass actions seeking mainly monetary relief usually fall under Rule 23(b)(3), which not only implicates class member notification and opt-out rights but also mandates additional findings by the trial court.” 908 A.2d at 88 . 8 . Available relief under the CPPA includes”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.