United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
908 F.2d 396 · 1990
Citation profile
95 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on Grogan v. Garner · Cordeiro v. United States · United States v. Evidente · United States v. Justice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] defendant's offense level should not turn on whether or not the banks recovered some of their potential loan losses.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n keeping with the Commission's policy on attempts, if a probable or intended loss that the defendant was attempting to inflict can be determined, that figure would be used if it was larger than the actual loss.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In Johnson, this court determined that the defendant's offense level was 'to be determined by the total amount of the two bank loans,' and was not decreased by the amounts the banks were able to recover by repossessing the defendant's automobile and from one of the bank's insurance companies.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.